Tim didn't even highlight the new personal best score he got a couple months back.
Luckily the video was saved by others.
Honestly, if this were to be put to a vote, I would vote for his no-hammer score to be accepted onto the scoreboard. No prize seems like a fair penalty, but the game did have plenty of witnesses. Without the points, it really torpedoes any chance Tim has of winning the tourney, and I like to see him do well!
But I also understand why accepting the score based on "witness testimony" might not be the best idea for the integrity of the tournament. (I'm pretty loosey-goosey about rules which is why I don't run forums or tournaments.
)