The way your PC runs MAME from version to version can affect the speed too, so be aware of that. Your PC might have a harder/easier time with different MAMEs and give you more/less lag.
This might actually be a good place to mention that I've heard lately on KLOV that there might be legitimate differences on the 60-in-1 DK. The guy was using Ms. Pac as an example of a game that isn't right timing-wise on a 60-in-1, and others were agreeing. I know the music is f'ed up on some games, and the walk sound on DK is wrong, but I thought these boards were 100% in terms of gameplay. Maybe not. So this might be a concern going forward (and backward for that matter).
I actually got a 60-in-1 board a few months ago and am waiting to buy a JAMMA Nintendo cab adapter. (Only one guy makes it and he hates money or something because he won't respond to my email.)
In any case, once I get it, I'm going to do a full diagnostic of 60-in-1 DK...
Cool , love to hear what you think about the 60n1 DK ! If its good , than what a deal , you can get those boards for like $50 .
As far as different versions of MAME playing differently on my computer , I think you hit the nail on the head , as far as my situation .
I tested MAME 0.90 using Task Manager watching the CPU usage and whats weird is the older version 0.90 , maxes out my CPU at 100% alot of the time . Where as the newer versions of MAME , CPU maxes out at around 70% .
Maybe it has to do with how the sound is being generated ??
But anyways , 0.90 maxes out my CPU alot , which I think makes the game run slightly slower , not very noticeable because the controls don't feel laggy , but the game seems easier and I think its maybe because its slightly running slower .
Its something to think about , everyones computer is different . Some people might be setting high scores on older slower computers , which might make it easier to play .