Would it be legit to get the 1-1 record by using a savestate?

[Xermon54]

I once asked this question to Phil, and he answered:"Fking hell no! If I had to fking watch the intro again and again and again, you fking have to watch it too!" 

Even if we all know that the only opinion that is worthy is Tudose's opinion, I'm just curious if others would consider a 1-1 record legit if someone would be using a savestate in the beginning of 1-1 to avoid having to watch the intro after each restart?

Personally, I think that trying to get the record on 1-1 is fun with a savestate at the beginning of the level, but without savestate, it's fking boring. Only the Tudose of Ontario is mentally strong enough to watch the intro 1000 times per day 

I think we should add a new track for Phil's record: 1-1 Tudose settings

Opinions?

[WCopeland]

I think topics like this are a prelude to a lot of uncomfortable questions that will be raised many years down the road from now.

When all original DK arcade boards have failed, how will any new players get the Arcade world record?  Will it be locked out, or will scores instead be divided by input method (4-way stick vs keyboard)?

[tudose]

haha you must watch the monkey climb

honestly though i wouldnt make a big deal about it lol. this is very similar to what does with his "arcade" setup, or mitch does with his d2k kit. tim doesnt kill off all his men when he dies, he simply resets the game from a switch on his board. he doesnt believe that quick resets cause any damage. as for the d2k kits im not very familiar with them. all i know is that you can reset the game quickly without turning the cab off. it ends up being just about as fast as restarting MAME

[marinomitch13]

As long as the savestate is from before the seeding for the next screen is made, I'm fine with it, as that's the biggest factor.

[Jeffw]

I would say no because you could make a savestate that gives the same good randomness every time.

As long as the savestate is from before the seeding for the next screen is made, I'm fine with it, as that's the biggest factor.

I think as soon as you enter the credit and hit start game the randomness for the start of the next screen will be determined, so the savestate would have to happen before this point, which doesn't save a lot of time.

[tudose]

hm i didnt know thats how the rng worked for the start of the game. i just assumed it would be decided at the start of the board

[Donkey Kong Genius]

It does not appear to be a poll issue. There must be something in the code that dictates the "seeding" that will occur in the upcoming level. If this happens before the save state then that should be disallowed. Though, another question I have is that we would need an inp, and if you record an inp, then you can't do save-states, correct?

[Jeffw]

The RNG is deterministic during periods where user input has no effect. So the "seed" for the randomness is essentially the frame at which you enter the credit and the frame at which you press start game. After hitting start game there is no more user input until the start of 1-1 so the RNG will be a deterministic sequence until you start messing it up with user input at the start of 1-1. However, if you do EXACTLY the same input the RNG will be exactly the same, so a savestate would make it easier to get the same randomness repeatedly.

[marinomitch13]

I would say no because you could make a savestate that gives the same good randomness every time.

As long as the savestate is from before the seeding for the next screen is made, I'm fine with it, as that's the biggest factor.

I think as soon as you enter the credit and hit start game the randomness for the start of the next screen will be determined, so the savestate would have to happen before this point, which doesn't save a lot of time.

Thanks for the info! I couldn't remember when the seeding was determined, but I figured someone did. I guess it's pretty much a moot point then: You gotta watch the monkey climb! 

[f_symbols]

Jump in the oil can or whatever!   

[mikegmi2]

  My advice would be to leave savestates behind, leave ROY behind...and only play on real arcade machines...like the one at Funspot.

[stella_blue]

I voted "No", as I consider myself a DK purist (Arcade vs. MAME notwithstanding).

[OzSteve71]

I think you need to ask the most serious question..... What would JCB do?

Cheat :-D

[stella_blue]

Though, another question I have is that we would need an inp, and if you record an inp, then you can't do save-states, correct?

You can record an INP that begins from a save state.

Let's say you want to practice the Level 05 elevator board, and record the results (using WolfMAME 0.106 and save state "e", created during the "stacked monkeys" screen prior to L5-4).

This command should work:

mamep106-vc dkong -state e -record dk_elevators_54.inp

Proper playback requires both the INP and STA files:

mamep106-vc dkong -state e -playback dk_elevators_54.inp

[d3scride]

I would only say no just because I'm not sure how it would affect the board seed.